That's why there are companies specialising in AI for physics, like Emmi AI (now part of Mistral). If BMW and Airbus go on stage to talk about how they're using it for their physics simulations, it's probably at least decent.

▲

20k 42 minutes ago | parent [-]

Usage isn't really a good indicator of quality currently in the AI space, the issue is that there's inherently no way that an AI physics sim can be as good as a real physics simulation, which makes it a very low value prospect

▲

sofixa 40 minutes ago | parent [-]

Usage by reputable engineering organisations with strict compliance and external testing validation (most notably Airbus, they have to prove to EASA that their tests are real and representative) is a decent indicator that there is something there.

	▲	wolvesechoes 23 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Do we have real case studies, or just a bunch of declarations? "Using AI for our physics simulations" is as vague as it can be.