| ▲ | unliftedq 6 hours ago | |
I'm tired of big news in this way - a small set of tests to declare one model is better than another, can they really consistently reproduce the result? And there's basically no disclosure: nothing other people can really hand on to verify the tests/judgement by themself. The best valuable part of DeepSeek V4 pro is its low price, I don't expect have much better performance than GPT-5.5, even it's just the performance like gpt-5.4, it's still a good model. | ||
| ▲ | sourcecodeplz an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> "I don't expect have much better performance than GPT-5.5 ..." Expectations are not always reality. Give the model a try. I just stuck with flash tbh, didn't even use pro. I do webdev in PHP. | ||