The comment you are replying to doesn't argue any such thing, and is pretty clear in its explanation of how your position is perfectly compatible with what is requested.

The author is arguing for it.

This is what the post was saying:

1. No nerfing to the game/service whatsoever. This means you can't just kill online play. Ever.

2. Charge a monthly price or significantly increase the purchasing price.

Clearly neither of these are viable for most games and the game industry.