| ▲ | bix6 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Is there any truth to the Chinese models having built in f’ery? Like phoning home or inserting backdoors. Or is that just everyone blanketing “China bad”? Also what local models are people running and actually finding useful? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bee_rider 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The models themselves should not be able to phone home, right? They are just piles of weights that generate text (and associated metadata), they don’t have any ability to run code. They could be trained to generate code that would phone home. But these are just tools, anybody doing the right thing and checking and understanding every line of code that they use an LLM to generate has nothing to worry about. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | deaux 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
No, there is zero truth in it. It would be trivial to detect phoning home. On top of that, all claims of this are written on devices built on Chinese hardware. That makes it a joke to worry about hidden backdoors in Chinese models. Completely inane to pretend that Chinese model backdoors (for which there doesn't exist a sliver of evidence) would change anything when near every device in the US contains Chinese-written firmware in some shape or form. It's All-American FUD. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | witx 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If you think american models aren't phoning home and don't have backdoor capabillities, you're naive. With all the sloppers not looking at the code this is bliss for that sort of things | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||