| ▲ | misnome 4 hours ago | |
For the most part there aren’t 10x engineers But there are certainly 0.1x engineers | ||
| ▲ | Fargren 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
The study that defined the 10x engineer defined him as 10x as good as the worst engineer. If there is a 0.1x engineer, and a 1x engineer, that 1x engineer is the very definition of a 10x engineer. | ||
| ▲ | trumpdong 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I've long thought a 10x engineer is one with just the right amount of analysis paralysis - not too much or too little. It's not that they're 10x engineers, it's that everyone else is 0.1x due to a confluence of reasons. And the ones we call 0.1x are 0.01x. | ||
| ▲ | rightbyte an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
There certainly are 10x engineers just that they get most of the x from turning down bad ideas and saving work. | ||
| ▲ | rjbwork 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
and -10x | ||