| ▲ | azan_ 6 hours ago |
| Isn't basically every decile getting richer (i.e. able to afford more things) thanks to economic growth? |
|
| ▲ | materielle 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| What if I don’t care about affording more things? And instead want to live in an ethical society that prioritizes stability and universal access to housing, healthcare, and education? |
| |
| ▲ | WalterBright 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's perfectly legal for you and like-minded people to set up a commune, and create the society you want. Or join an existing one. | | |
| ▲ | WalterBright 44 minutes ago | parent [-] | | BTW, the best I can figure is the average commune member quits after about 2 years, cured of the notion that communism is for them. |
| |
| ▲ | nostrebored 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | i think the reason for your deluge of downvotes is that a society the promotes more things becoming affordable is one that prioritizes stability. universal access to housing, healthcare, and education that people want is only possible in a society that is immensely productive. | | | |
| ▲ | AndrewKemendo 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Welcome to the forever dissapointed club. The society you desire can’t exist unfortunately as much as I’ve thought it could and worked for it |
|
|
| ▲ | SecretDreams 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| No. It's a k-type curve where the high deciles are getting higher and the lows are getting lower, so to speak. There is increasingly becoming more of a divide between haves and have nots, and it has a temporal component because of how equity has appreciated over the last decade or so. Both housing and stocks. People from a decade ago have seen absolutely unsustainable appreciation in their assets while doing nothing. That is putting them at structural advantages against younger generations that will not see those same appreciations. It's like the bus has left without them. No matter how hard and fast they run, someone asleep on the bus will always be ahead of them. |
| |
| ▲ | laughing_man 16 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | That's not true. The highs are getting higher and the lows are getting higher as well. | |
| ▲ | dmm 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > It's a k-type curve where the high deciles are getting higher and the lows are getting lower The lowest quartile of income have had the highest growth the past four years. | | |
| ▲ | mcmcmc 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | dmm 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | He didn't post a source either. Go look at the Atlanta Fed's wage growth data if you're actually interested. |
|
| |
| ▲ | SlightlyLeftPad 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Looking back in human history, what was the ultimate outcome for similar economic conditions? | | |
|