| ▲ | theK an hour ago | |||||||
Didn't he just say that fork turns out to be comparatively faster to the non-fork samples we get? Ie Linux spawns processes faster than Microsoft's kernels? | ||||||||
| ▲ | mort96 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Didn't I just say that "the problem with fork isn't really that it's slow"? It's all the other OS design choices it forces on you if you want it to be fast. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | nvme0n1p1 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
We don't have any broadly used non-fork samples. Windows, macOS, and Linux all have fork. So the presence of fork can't be the reason for the performance difference. (Windows's fork is called ZwCreateProcess) | ||||||||
| ||||||||