Considering that most of the rules states would introduce would run a foul of interstate commerce, it seems like a good way to get ahead of pointless lawsuits.

Note that these rules apply to the development of AI, not any restriction on how it is used in e.g. schools, communications etc.

▲

mikem170 a minute ago | parent | next [-]

[delayed]

▲

Retric 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Interstate commerce has been redefined to mean both way less and way more than the phrase might seem to imply. States can for example introduce rules on emissions when no cars are manufactured in that state.

	▲	cataphract an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Not really. The only reason California was able to do this is because it got waivers for the federal law preemption rule (in the Clean Air Act).
	▲	cyanydeez an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		unless it involves abortions, then it's whatever the Republican parties want to punish women. Or minorities. or black people. Infact, rules only matter when we're talking about people we dont like.