| ▲ | ljlolel 4 hours ago |
| So then wouldn’t cover open source |
|
| ▲ | lokar 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| they often argue that allowing something in one state, even limited to that state, impacts commerce in other states. I think they would use a similar argument here. |
| |
| ▲ | pfdietz 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, AI regulation is squarely in the wheelhouse of the Commerce Clause. | | |
| ▲ | gopher_space 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't think we've found any topic or situation that doesn't fall under the Commerce Clause. | | |
| ▲ | iAMkenough an hour ago | parent [-] | | If there is such a topic or situation, we can always fall back to the "national security" rationale. That covers everything else the federal government wants to impose on states. |
| |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
