| ▲ | viceconsole 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
In the US at least, many pension funds are not sophisticated, they're small, underfunded, and getting taken for a ride by expensive advisors who promise fantastical returns that will help dig them out of their funding ratio hole. Many would be better off using an S&P 500 index fund for their equity component instead of getting wined and dined into an illiquid, opaque private equity investment. Telling that among OECD countries, the US is an outlier in having a much lower average funding ratio, and this despite the fantastic performance of the US stock market over the last 15 years. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> many pension funds are not sophisticated, they're small, underfunded, and getting taken for a ride by expensive advisors Who tend to come up with bumfuck benchmarks other than the common ones. Sometimes for good reasons. Often to justify their own comp. > Many would be better off using an S&P 500 index fund Maybe. They would probably be better off with some total-market funds (instead of biasing towards large caps, especially if they're small). But my point stands: pension funds don't tend to automatically follow any major index, much less the S&P 500 proper. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||