| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You don't need an AI attribution tag to recognize slop. In my experience reviewing PRs, the slop-pushers are most aggressive about stripping the AI attribution anyway. It's the normal devs who use a little bit of AI who leave it in. The tag is helpful because AI authorship is different than the human authorship. When you work with a project or team for long enough you start to trust certain people and their intuition, but when they start submitting AI-produced code you have to reset and review it like AI code. I use these tools a lot, too. But I want to know where the code came from so I can review it accordingly. The source matters. > Ostracize us? I don't know why you're so defensive. If AI wrote the code just be honest about it. If you outsourced the code writing to some guy named Bob on Fiverr, I'd want to know that too. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | matheusmoreira 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I don't know why you're so defensive. Check it out: https://lobste.rs/s/29pm2f/llm_generated_submissions_should_... https://lobste.rs/s/ytim7h/collection_small_low_stakes_low_e... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||