It's aggressive but true. Spam traffic exceeded real email back in 2003. He's not even in the right DECADE to declare a first for non-human traffic. It's pure marketing BS that is only remotely true if you accept the conditions he goes to lengths to hide.

▲

simonw an hour ago | parent [-]

What lengths did he go to in order to hide them?

	▲	burnte 44 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Misleading headline statement, no clarifying statements later that is restricted to HTTP traffic, graphs chosen to support the misleading message. Putting out the truth behind an asterisk isn't being honest.