So the original unfounded claim has 400+ comments because its perfect HN ragebait

The author provides evidence to the contrary and the HNers won't even engage with it instead just talking about the writing of the article in classic HN bikeshedding fashion.

How about after that we talk about the formatting of the website and the colors?

This site is really going down hill

Where is the accountability for your own opinions?

Are you guys only upvoting things that confirm your existing gripes?

▲

dang 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Comments like this do more of what they complain about, only with an extra layer of judgment.

It would be preferable if someone would seed a better discussion by engaging with the article's claims/observations.

▲

ex-aws-dude an hour ago | parent [-]

Why did you the admin allow such ragebait to stay on the front page then?

Is that the kind of low effort posts we want around here? Just a link to a github comment of a screenshot?

You're complicit here in fueling the harassment of an open source project

	▲	dang an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I don't have enough background info to understand what you're referring to here. Even if you're right, though, you shouldn't be posting comments that break the site guidelines.