| ▲ | js2 2 hours ago |
| As of 11 minutes ago, the headline is now the opposite of that submitted: > Astronauts told to return to International Space Station after sheltering over air leak repairs. |
|
| ▲ | dang 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| We've updated it above. Thanks! (Submitted title was "Astronauts on ISS told to shelter as repairs under way to fix air leaks", no doubt because that's what the article said at the time.) |
|
| ▲ | caminante 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Oh, so it's a live blog with updates and a dynamic headline. |
| |
| ▲ | mynameisvlad 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It has "Live Updates" in big bold text as one of the first and most prominent lines on the page so... yes? Is that a problem? Publications have had live-updating articles for things ongoing for years. This seems both entirely reasonable and normal, and I'm not sure what the concern or issue is. | | |
| ▲ | glitcher 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I read their comment as a simple “oh ok I understand now” type of clarification, not a complaint. | |
| ▲ | red_Seashell_32 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | As per submission guidelines: > Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize. So, even if you use original title, once "Live Update" article changes, it might seem that submission did not use original title. | | |
| ▲ | mynameisvlad 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The point of the rule is to not editorialize, not to keep an always-updating title. | | |
| ▲ | munk-a 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Given that the title was highly accurate at time of submission perhaps a moderator will update the title further but the submission seems to be inline with all the guidelines. This is actually also a case where I think it wouldn't be unappreciated to deviate a bit from the article title to something like Live Updates: Astronauts on ISS told... |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
