Optimizing for food that costs the least in ingredients, at the same time is provenly unhealthy, and has addictive properties, is a totally valid strategy for a free market but it's far from "feeding the world".

And better accessibility of unhealthy food in comparison to healthy food is a reality for many people, especially when they cannot outsource the act of buying and preparing food to others, including family, or spend arbitrary amounts of money on luxury "health food".

I'm not saying it's impossible to buy healthy food, or the responsibility of regulation to dictate what people eat.

But what you say about marketing seems besides the point to me.

Optimizing marketing of food for profit is not equal to "feeding the world".

▲

cm2012 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Every kind of food is currently being made: healthy fresh food, processed foods of various types at all different price ranges. People have options to buy what they want and that's a good thing.

	▲	moritzwarhier 22 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Of course! But the availability of these options when you're say, doing lunch break in a particular city, is not unlimited. I explicitly said that I'm not for a government dictate on what food should be made. I did not add any suggestion on how to deal with the problem, but my statement said that maximizing profits on food can be exploitative.