| ▲ | watwut 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
In some places, graffiti means "gang activity" as local gangs tag their turf. If you are from such place, then it kinda makes sense to be afraid of graffity. But where I am from, there are two kinds of graffity: - Cool elaborate pictures, usually in "legal zones" walls city dedicated to it. They take time to create, hence preference for legal place and are made by artists. - Less cool stuff created by skinny "edgy" teenagers, who are jerks to the owners, but also completely harmless. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ggm 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Completely harmless needs contextualising. In gross sense, no: damage to property is not harmless, it has consequences, costs. In personal safety terms sure tagging isn't mugging. If you're down Proudhon's "all property is theft" then graffiti is a kind of tragedy of the commons. Go ahead. Graffiti the Uffitzi, Nelson's column, the Plaka. Stick it to the man! | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | keiferski 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I don’t understand why people just tolerate graffiti. It’s ugly and makes buildings look worse. Aesthetics matter. Nothing more irritating that having your apartment building get a fresh coat of paint, look great, and then someone writing scribble tags all over it. | |||||||||||||||||