I’m curious about how you used LLMs here?

Also, to what extent you designed this vs the LLM copying it?

My concern is all these vibe coded projects with huge readmes and fake GitHub stars are essentially just copying the work of others, and don’t really do anything new.

▲

throwa356262 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can see in the git commit log how it has progressed slowly over a period of one year to get here.

So at least it is not a weekend vibe coded AI slop.

▲

marcosscriven 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Not sure 600,000 commits by one person in a year, most concentrated in a few months over the year, counts as “slowly”.

	▲	geotp 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Where do you see 600k commits? Are you talking about 600k lines of code? If so, the project includes libraries in the `lib` folder, notably a large screen library called `tft_espi` which must be 500k lines on its own (which has since been removed, that's why you see -500k lines) I know the codebase inside and out, feel free to ask
	▲	coldcity_again an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		There are 1300 commits. What is everyone smoking today?

▲

geotp 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I’m not sure I fully understand the question.

The implementation is entirely new and was built specifically for this project, it is not copied from another project. LLMs were used as development tools, but the architecture, feature selection, integration, testing, and overall direction were designed and validated by contributors and me.