This seems quite misguided and is sad to see. They have every right to do this, but I was looking forward to continuing testing Ladybird as it improves and contributing in the future. I hope servo stays open to contributions, as it seems like it's all we have left.

It makes sense when you have a somewhat fixed core team size. Frankly, in some regards, this is the responsible thing to do.

It means they’ll never grow modules or the codebase beyond what the team can reasonably maintain.

However on the other hand.. What does this mean for the existing team, are maintainers now worth considerably more to the project? What does this mean for the codebase, or the momentum of the project?

It’s an approach I would have expected for the likes of curl, or single-purpose libraries. But this is a mammoth decision for a mammoth project.

I guess we’ll just have to see.

You can still contribute through bug reports.

>This seems quite misguided

Does it? Seems the only sane option. The other being being drowned in AI slop PRs.