| ▲ | i_am_a_peasant 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
My only problem with C++ is that it’s too verbose. my eyes need to parse huuge chunks of things when I just want some convenient syntax for it. otherwise the idioms are pretty universal for most programming languages nowadays. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tonyedgecombe 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The trouble with that is the more mental capacity you exert on the language the less you have available for the task at hand. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | einpoklum 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
C++ is quite amenable to making things less verbose. For example: Instead of a standard library algorithm taking a pair of iterators, you could have a function taking a container and calling the other function with its start() and end(). And then, with newer versions of the language, you can use a ranges-based function. There are lots of such syntactic hacks, from `using` through typed literals all the way to preprocessor macros (which we want to avoid, but are still there). That's how you emulate language features that aren't there originally. I've "impelemented" a static code block, like in Java: https://stackoverflow.com/a/34321324/1593077 and that's all in C++98. The implementation is a bit ugly but the use is terse and self-expalantory. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Zardoz84 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Try Java | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||