> So why change? You're not building a case for why this change is needed

It has changed loads of times. Nobody noticed any time. Including this one. (Look at flows into and out of related funds.)

> Is there even another Nasdaq 100 company like SpaceX?

Right now? No. Including SpaceX. By the end of the year? Probably a few.

> Is it a fund or just an index? If an index, what are you monitoring when you cite 'no outflows'?

Covered assets. Indices license their indices. Funds pay that royalty.