| ▲ | maest 2 hours ago | |
> Everyone picking the S&P 500 over its competitors chooses that. I'm fairly confident most people deciding to allocate to s&p trackers have no idea about rules-based vs committee-based governance. They just pick the default. And that default can quickly change if the S&P starts making weird/unpopular decisions in a highly publicized situation. | ||
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> most people deciding to allocate to s&p trackers have no idea about rules-based vs committee-based governance. They just pick the default A lot of retail goes into S&P lookalikes. And at the end of the day, they've consistently picked one over the other. > that default can quickly change if the S&P starts making weird/unpopular decisions in a highly publicized situation Unlikely. Nobody has dropped NASDAQ 100-tracking funds. If anything, these guys will see long-term net inflows due to this move. S&P probably would have if they’d changed rules—this was an econometric, not business, decision. | ||