| ▲ | neild 2 hours ago | |
Fair enough, but that leaves us with no way to represent zone IDs in URLs at all. Neither http://[fe80::4%eth0]/ nor http://[fe80::4%25eth0]/ is valid under RFC 3986. Given that net/url has supported RFC 6874 since before RFC 9844 came along, our choices are: * Keep supporting the RFC 6874 syntax. * Drop support for it, require strict RFC 3986, have no support for zone IDs in URLs at all. Breaks existing users, utterly infeasible. * Stop supporting RFC 6875 and start supporting an unescaped % as the zone ID separator, which conforms to no standard I know of. Also breaks existing users, infeasible. * Some sort of hybrid where we try to support both %25 and % as a separator? Ugh. Of these, keeping the existing support as-is until or unless a new standard comes along seems like the best option. | ||
| ▲ | agwa an hour ago | parent [-] | |
Yeah, I agree. No criticism of Go's behavior is intended; just pointing out that the RFC is technically dead. | ||