| ▲ | nine_k an hour ago |
| Isn't 127/8 always present in IPv4, without I'll consequences? |
|
| ▲ | josephcsible an hour ago | parent [-] |
| I meant it's one address per interface, and loopback has always been its own interface. |
| |
| ▲ | trumpdong 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | One address per host is more common in serious networks that don't have endless IP addresses (10/8 block) allocated to them. | | |
| ▲ | dcrazy 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | There is no problem with allocating one 127.0.0.0/8 to every interface on your host, because 127.0.0.0/8 is only ever accessible to the host itself. So even if you have multi-homed a single routable IPv4 address to 2 NICs on your server (for redundancy), you can still assign 127.0.0.1 to the first and 127.0.0.2 for the second, which you can then use to bind a port to a specific interface in the pair. (I don’t know if anyone actually does this.) |
|
|