What philosophy? The gender based outcomes people never seem able to come up with any coherent explanation of what they think the problem is other then to play to stereotypes.

▲

rootusrootus an hour ago | parent | next [-]

The explanation that I’ve seen floated is behavioral. Boys are active and physical and don’t focus as easily as girls, who are more amenable to sitting quietly and paying attention. The idea is that the current predominant K12 style favors students in the latter behavior group.

I have two kids in K12 and I don’t think it’s that simple. Not that I have a good explanation of my own, mind you.

▲

an hour ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

jplusequalt an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

>who are more amenable to sitting quietly and paying attention

Is this explanation not making a blatant assumption here that girls are statistically less hyperactive and distracted than boys?

	▲	rootusrootus a minute ago \| parent [-]
		Is that controversial (assuming otherwise normal children, excluding anybody with ADHD, etc)?

▲

Avicebron an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> What philosophy?

They might be referring to the TED Radio Hour "Beyond the manosphere" by Richard Reeves. I think it was on NPR a while ago, I looked it up because the "school isn't designed for boys but girls" sounded familiar.

▲

bilbo0s an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

This.

A math test is a math test is a math test.

What's the math teacher supposed to do?

I hate to be that guy, but I think it should be pointed out that asian boys don't seem to have much of a problem. If there's a gender bias, why do they succeed?