| ▲ | techblueberry 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> A caveat: Lines of code is an imperfect measure, as it measures quantity over quality. So 8× lines of code/engineer/day in the second quarter of 2026 is almost certainly an overstatement of the true productivity gain. Nonetheless, it indicates an acceleration. At Anthropic, we don’t reward people for how many lines of code they write; rather, team members are producing more code simply because they’re using AI systems to write more code. I simultaneously think the AI revolution is making real revolutionary gains and am mystified by the lying. An accurate Translation seems to be “we made this shit up, but it feels right” | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Until the moment we start bragging about how many lines of code LLMs are saving us, we're walking in the wrong direction. Your programs, designs and architectures is supposed to get better, not add even more boilerplate just because you can produce it faster... | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jazzyjackson 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I guess the claim is simply that AI written code is verbose and there’s lots of it being created but I agree, these systems seem to be able to create lots of low quality software, so until FreeCAD has feature parity with Solidworks I’m bearish on the singularity. | |||||||||||||||||