| ▲ | A discovery about GCC's unidirectional rotation algorithm(devblogs.microsoft.com) |
| 20 points by soheilpro 4 days ago | 9 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | jdw64 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Looking at this, I feel that while there seem to be many different actual implementations, they really boil down to just a few similar core principles |
|
| ▲ | srean 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| 'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole. |
| |
| ▲ | jraph an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | This is obviously humor. You stopped at the lexicon, check how it's used more thoroughly! | | | |
| ▲ | DonHopkins 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | He found that gambling was going on in here! | |
| ▲ | saagarjha 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Gee I wonder why Raymond would do that | | |
| ▲ | srean 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I have no context. Was that sarcasm ? I have no idea if this is expected or unexpected of Raymond. | | |
| ▲ | dataflow 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Try again? You don't really need context here. Blog said: "As with all shocking discoveries, this one will <strike>shock</strike> disappoint you." You complained: "'Shocking', 'striking', 'disappointing', 'will shock you' -- the article is padded with hyperbole." | | |
| ▲ | jraph an hour ago | parent [-] | | Damn, reader mode doesn't keep the strike, I thought it was an English idiom I didn't know about xD |
|
|
|
|
