Here's a frankly better article from the NYT:

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/01/climate/ocean-observatori...

A few points:

1. The ocean observation system began operating in 2016 and was expected to continue for 25 years.

2. It cost $48 million annually to operate the network. The Trump administration repeatedly tried to shutter it, proposing to cut its funding by 80 percent in both 2025 and again in 2026. Congress pushed back, restoring the money.

3. “One of the real tragedies here is that collecting data effectively at this site was a huge engineering challenge, and it’s not the kind of thing where you can just leave your notes for the next person who comes in,” Dr. Palevsky said. “There’s a lot of expertise that has the potential to be lost.”

The administration is, as I understand it, in violation of the constitution by shutting this down. It was funded by Congress, twice. The executive branch cannot just legally not spend that money.

Regarding your 3.

What? It’s just data.

What requires expertise is massaging the data to conform to the narrative.

The world is ending and it’s all <that things> fault, for whatever that thing is trending this week.