I'd run Mythos against the code in your zip file, but the NDA I signed at Apple prevents me from using it on anything outside the scope of my work. Honestly, I wish more people from Project Glasswing could talk publicly about their experiences with the model. It would probably put an end to a lot of the speculation that keeps circulating through the industry. Unfortunately, that's not the reality we're in. I don't have the time, energy, or financial resources to fight a legal battle with one of these companies over an agreement I knowingly signed, even if the chances of them actually suing are low. Maybe someone else in Project Glasswing is willing to burn their NDA and post the Mythos results?

▲

CaveTech 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It was found with gpt 5.5 7/10 times it’ll be trivially found by mythos

▲

afro88 3 hours ago | parent [-]

That's an example of why it would be useful for someone to actually do it. A random commenter on HN is one thing. A direct comparison on a brand new app that isn't part of any training is another

▲

CaveTech 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I’m highly confident that prior exposure is irrelevant at this point. I work on vulnerability detection at a hyperscaler.

	▲	HDBaseT 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's an example of why it would be useful for someone to actually do it. A random commenter on HN is one thing. A direct comparison on a brand new app that isn't part of any training is another

▲

tsunamifury 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

cool.

▲

nznzjzizixnsnsj 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

lol what is even the point of this kind of comment? this is the ultimate "source: trust me bro" comment I have ever seen.

every model since gpt3 was claimed to be "too dangerous to release." it's too EXPENSIVE to release, and you're probably a local model with <10B parameters yourself