I kinda feel that's like "video game tester". Sounds great from the outside, but I bet he spent 90% of time reading absolute dreck.

▲

NooneAtAll3 9 days ago | parent | next [-]

the worst part isn't even the garbage, it's the "good plot written in very bad way"

you power through it, you get invested - but you know that nothing will ever come out of it and in no way can you recommend it

▲

ginko 9 days ago | parent | next [-]

Good plot / bad writing seems like a good fit for a film adaption if you get the right director.

	▲	cestith 9 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Even a better fit with a really good screenwriter.
	▲	NooneAtAll3 7 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		that's like saying remakes are a good fit for bad films maybe it's true - but it doesn't happen

▲

9 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

Cthulhu_ 9 days ago | parent | prev [-]

And yet, it's not unusual that a poorly written book gets a decent movie adaptation. Sometimes it's not even a good plot OR well written, sometimes a book is just popular and the execs cash in on its popularity.

I'm thinking things like Da Vinci Code, 50 shades, Twilight, neither of which (the books) are particularly good or tasteful or whatever, but they were very popular, appealing to people who normally don't read books.

▲

david927 9 days ago | parent | prev [-]

You're definitely looking for something other than the writing and even the plot. For example, the novel "The Firm" had a ridiculous ending but they fixed it for the screenplay.

I dropped of a book to this guy that I had just finished called "The Hotel on the Roof of the World," and he later told me that they optioned the author. Unfortunately the film never got made, but if you read it you'll see it has the bones of a really nice film.