1970-01-01 3 hours ago

Why is it wrong to expect humans (mathematicians) to adapt here? AI is already producing solutions to problems that humans could not find. Culture holds value until it does not.

▲

Ancalagon 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Did you mean to say "culture"?

> Culture holds value until it does not.

▲

QuantumNoodle 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sorry did you read the article or just the headline? The theme is mathematics is a human-endevor and automation undermines that, particularly the ones starting out. It risks killing the culture entirely. Some other key points:

- AI-generated papers could overwhelm peer-review systems with low-quality work.

- It may become difficult to assign proper credit for discoveries.

- Researchers who choose not to use AI tools could be disadvantaged.

- There are ethical concerns about mathematical work being used to train AI for military and surveillance purposes.

	▲	1970-01-01 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		>mathematics is a human-endevor Just like numbers and logic, it isn't and never was reserved only for humans. They need to adapt.
	▲	HDThoreaun 23 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Mathematics is not inherently a human endeavor and claims such as those are why the GOP voters are fine with cutting research funding so heavily. Even if you think it's true you probably shouldnt write think pieces that say so because it's bad politics.