| ▲ | jvanderbot 9 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Right - the future of LLMs is like ol' windows XP+Dell. Commercialized "things" you run locally offline, co-designed with hardware, with a known productivity suite, and large businesses building the next generation thing and suite with 18mo release cycles (ish). | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | treis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I don't see it. Leasing equipment and paying per seat license fees makes a lot of accounting and cash flow sense. Maybe when it gets to the point where you can run SOTA LLMs on consumer hardware. But that seems a solid decade and probably much more away. Even then it makes more sense to rent the bigger GPU and get your answer faster. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nonethewiser 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
XP? I can see the argument for enterprise support but in that case the latest windows OS is going to be virtually free and I dont know if MS and Dell etc. would even support an XP machine. Might even be required for hardware. If no enterprise support wouldnt Linux make a lot more sense? I get that if it's offline the security downside of XP doesnt matter, and I assume XP is free, but being free doesnt really seem that valuable compared to alternatives (free linux and virtually free OS if buying wholesale). | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gedy 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
There's waayyyy too much money betting on that not happening, to the point I feel there'll be regulations popping up for "safety reasons" etc to ensure the big players control this. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||