| ▲ | foldr 3 hours ago |
| Obviously. Who could possibly be writing ARM assembly code who is not also aware that system calls, etc. will vary across platforms? Sometimes you do seem to make negative comments just for the sake of it. |
|
| ▲ | pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent [-] |
| So it isn't portable after all... |
| |
| ▲ | foldr 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you can understand what someone means when they talk about a “small elephant”, then you can understand what they mean when they talk about “portable assembly”. In this case, the relevant point is that you can write ARM64 assembly routines that do useful work (e.g optimized matrix multiplication, or something like that) in such a way that they’ll work correctly on a number of different ARM64 platforms. |
|