| ▲ | linuxhansl 6 hours ago | |
I am using Opus 4.x at work, and these "smaller" (20-80bn, 3-4bn active) models at home. Unfortunately there is no comparison, yet (IMHO anyway). With Opus I can work, trust its designs, architecture suggestions, and code changes, even in a complex code base. The smaller models seem to "try". They work for smaller tasks, but for more complex task it's often more work than doing it myself. I wish it were different, and maybe in a year or two it will be. | ||
| ▲ | therealdrag0 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Ya when it’s your own token budget on the line the smaller/cheaper models are more attractive. I’ve used GPT mini quite a bit and it’s decent. | ||