| ▲ | julianlam an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
Respectfully, as an OSS maintainer (not to the scale of nginx or valkey, of course)... if a third-party used an AI agent to rewrite my software in a different language, that gives me absolutely no reason to support that new project. It is in all respects foreign code in a language I may or may not be familiar with, and worse yet, if I were to take over, I'd be responsible for maintaining the whole black box forever more? Thank you but no thanks. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | baq 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I don’t think anyone expects you to TBH. If you show interest, great. If not, the robot will translate your work into a different form of expression anyway. If you’re releasing open source software under BSD-like licenses, it’s still better than some company taking your work and selling it with zero value contributed back. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ianm218 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yes I hope this can be separated from people who are inundating OSS maintainers with slop PRs - these are fully separate projects with zero expectation of involvement from maintainers. Valkey itself is forked off the original Redis. There might be a world where people soon just find unsafe C code exposed to the web (i.e. nginx) an untenable situation and I hope it can be a helpful resource. Anyway, I see open source code as positive sum. Maybe in the end only a small community who cares about cross compilation finds this helpful and thats a win! | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dyauspitr 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Why would you have to take it over? Wouldn’t it just be a fork/different project entirely. | |||||||||||||||||