| ▲ | lanycrost 4 hours ago | |||||||
systemd is complex on first view, but after using it you didn't want to use anything else. It's handy to manage everything using systemctl | ||||||||
| ▲ | bjoli an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I hard disagree. Previously I could use what I knew about Linux commands to read logs and administer the systemm. Systemctl knowledge does not generalize. I have done scheme all my life, which is why I prefer shepherd. Not only is it in a syntax that i can use elsewhere, I get completion in Emacs. | ||||||||
| ▲ | alyandon 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
That and systemd having actually useful man pages. | ||||||||
| ▲ | egorfine 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Some people see it differently. As in: after using it they don't want to use it. I hate systemd with passion. But that's because I'm old because obviously systemd-* is the only right way and everyone else who see things differently is a pundit. | ||||||||
| ▲ | the_real_cher 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
This is such a modern view. People used to HATE systemd when it first came out, but I always liked it and knew people would eventually come around and its nice to see they finally did! | ||||||||
| ||||||||