|
| ▲ | irdc 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| > It's surprising that they're not doing that systematically around the building There's a very good reason for that: archaeological techniques improve all the time. The idea here is to leave something for future archaeologists. |
|
| ▲ | ninjalanternshk 10 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| By not excavating the whole city they leave work for future archaeologists. :) |
|
| ▲ | vasco 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > It's surprising that they're not doing that systematically around the building, but then again I guess that applies to a large part of the city as well. In some places in Italy, Greece, Malta, probably others I don't know, people always joke that you shouldn't try to ever do any renovations lest you end up finding something and lose your house. Some places you're almost guaranteed to find stuff if you just dig once or twice. |
|
| ▲ | cubefox 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > One always wonders which incredible books we lost, from amazing mysterious old philosophers. You might be interested in The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco, a historical novel about such a lost work. |
