Okay, but is it not what you wished for, "a similar tool for the modern era"?

edit: I see I simul-posted with u/modeless, but I can't remove it now that there's a (duplicate) reply. Maybe mods can remove or at least collapse mine (their ID is one lower so they were first)

▲

hackyhacky 6 hours ago | parent [-]

WinDbg is just a debugger: it does not assemble or disassemble. It can't patch running programs in memory. Moreover, I don't consider Windows to be part of the modern era, as I haven't used a Windows machine for 20 years.

So, no, WinDbg has nothing to do with debug.com.

▲

LastTrain 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Fun! So how was OP supposed to know your very personal and weird definition of what is part of the modern era?

	▲	hackyhacky 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If OP wanted to know whether WinDbg and debug.com can be considered feature-similar, they could have read my first comment [1], where I specifically said that debug.com is a "debugger, assembler, and disassembler". Of those three features, WinDbg provides one. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48362927