| ▲ | swiftcoder 7 hours ago |
| How is Alphabet suddenly short of capital? |
|
| ▲ | chatmasta 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| You don’t raise money because you’re short on capital. You raise when you’re in a position of power and capital is cheap. |
| |
| ▲ | sandeepkd 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Or if you think that you may not be able to raise this kind of money if the AI story goes down after all these IPOs | | |
| ▲ | AndrewKemendo 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Both of these tell the actual market position: 1. There’s real profit/value expected in pursuing the full automation of the labor market to the extent that the Board will approve large debts to known allies (BH) who only invest in long term infrastructure. So they are investing in more AI infrastructure with long term capital because they see the payoff in the long term. 2. That also means they aren’t doing market moving plays in public like selling corporate debt because they don’t want to be in the short term froth with a long term bet. | | |
| ▲ | ilteris 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | They already have shitloads corp debt. They don't want to over leverage. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | ilteris 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Capital is cheap how? Are you saying they think capital would get more expensive? | | |
| ▲ | skybrian an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | More money for less stock, because Google’s stock has gone up in price. By contrast, a stock buyback makes sense when the stock is cheap. So I guess Google doesn’t think their stock is particularly cheap, but Berkshire Hathaway wants to buy more anyway. (At a slight discount.) | |
| ▲ | fancyfredbot 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Capital is cheap for Google because they are making a lot of money and they have very little debt. They are considered a very low risk and can borrow for a long time at low rates. They recently issued a 100 year bond. They seem to have decided to issue equity rather than borrow more. This is probably so that they can maintain the ability to borrow very cheaply in future if necessary. | | |
| ▲ | ilteris 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sorry I am not buying into that. In your logic they should issue more debt. Their operating margin is lowest compared to Microsoft and meta. If oil goes to 200 tomorrow their profit margin will be squeezed most along with meta. (Ads) Backlog in cloud does not mean shit imo. They can slow roll it. Matter of fact half of that backlog seems backed by anthropic anyway. So imagine anthropic not making money because of a down turn and going down. Who will pay the backlog? This is exactly why they are diluting their stock instead of issuing more debt, they don't want to put all their eggs in one basket and want to retain capital for such downturn. That's how I read it. | | |
| ▲ | hustwindmaple 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | They've already issued $80B in 6 markets/currencies. How much more do you think they can raise at a decent rate? I think they might issue more next year. Issuing new equity might be a financial engineering experiment. No other mag7 has tried it. Plus they got BH name on the plate. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | H8crilA 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Latest filing, as of end of March 2026, shows $126.8B in total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001652044/0... I guess they don't want to burn it down to $40B? |
|
| ▲ | missedthecue 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They have $100B on the balance sheet. The best time to raise capital is when you don't need it, and the worst time is when you desperately do. |
|
| ▲ | roxolotl 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| These companies have pivoted from being cash generation machines to being data center building companies. It’s a huge bet that might pay off but the market is starting to notice that where there used to be revenue generation there is now infrastructure spend. |
|
| ▲ | whatever1 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Nobody has the capital to casually invest 200B PER YEAR, in cash, for multiple years. Literally nobody. |
| |
| ▲ | gizajob 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Masayoshi Son does a pretty good job of setting about that much cash aflame every year. | |
| ▲ | ycui7 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | maybe it is wrong to spend 200B every year continuously to begin with. | | |
| ▲ | whatever1 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Also I don’t think any of these companies has handled big capex programs in the past (maybe AWS a bit since Amazon is building things, but it did so incrementally), aka they don’t have the institutional knowledge to manage the risk associated with it. Semiconductor/ Big Oil/ Rail/ Telco have. | | |
| ▲ | fragmede 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you're going to bring up CapEx, Cloud is entirely a CapEx vs OpEx play so AWS and GCP are entirely familiar with the risks there. AWS dates back to 2006 and Google was building data centers long before GCP was public. Smaller, sure, but their finance team understand CapEx and OpEx well. | | |
| ▲ | whatever1 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don’t think I agree. Cloud has not faced (yet) a serious downturn. I can invest perfectly in an always up market. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | bunderbunder 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I could have paid cash for my car, but that would have been a bad move. I wouldn’t have had any liquid assets left over for getting me through a rainy day. The interest I paid on the loan was an acceptable price for reducing my overall risk exposure. Even if Alphabet has $80B sitting in the bank, they could quite reasonably arrive at a comparable decision. |
|
| ▲ | bpodgursky 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The market wants to put money into AI. The market thinks Alphabet is most able to efficiently turn $80B into more money by investing in AI infrastructure. So, Alphabet is happy to oblige them, given the favorable terms. |
| |
| ▲ | SXX 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | More likely Berkshire Hathaway knows that investing into Alphabet isnt just gonna end with -100% of investment when bubble pops. |
|
|
| ▲ | newsclues 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Preparing for acquisitions? |
|
| ▲ | SecretDreams 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Are we watching the same AI capex spending choices over the last 1-2 years? Every company from megacorps to small fish are spending well in excess of profits on these capex expansions. No ROI timelines yet established.... |
| |
| ▲ | hobofan 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Google has a committed cloud compute backlog of $462b. That's their compute buildout for the next ~2.5 years completely financed. |
|
