Fair but my point is simply, if a gun kills a person it's functioning as intended, but you can't say the same about a chat bot.

▲

chrisco255 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

A gun doesn't kill a person without being driven to action by a human. There are numerous alternative weapons to use, like using a candlestick in the conservatory or a rope in the lead pipe in the study for example.

	▲	bob1029 9 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> A gun doesn't kill a person without being driven to action by a human. See: p320 uncommanded discharge controversy.

▲

JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> if a gun kills a person it's functioning as intended, but you can't say the same for a chat bot

Of course you can. AI has been deployed in multiple military campaigns.

▲

vorticalbox an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Their job is to generate text if that text is good or bad they are functioning as intended.