| ▲ | adamrezich 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why is it only a matter of time? The AI-as-a-service companies are going to continue to improve their products by improving both the part that could be reproduced in a self-hosted setup, but also the “secret sauce” they put on top of that to make it a better product. There is no incentive for this “secret sauce” to be something that can be reproduced for self-hosting, is there? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | h14h an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think a major incentive could be to sell hardware. If Apple is able to get their hands on a local LLM capable of covering a significant % of what people use ChatGPT for, the pitch they can offer is: "Free, private, offline ChatGPT so long as your laptop has X GB of RAM" Beyond that, I wouldn't underestimate the incentive of "because I can". The "secret sauce" you refer to is effectively just a DB & a while loop that feeds text to a bunch of tensors. If an indie dev decides they want to release something that dismantles the OpenAI & Anthropic moats, there really isn't all that big of a technical barrier stopping them. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thewebguyd an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
What secret sauce? We already have open source tooling for tool use, web browsing, and code execution/computer use. Open weight models will win in the end. AIaaS might keep an edge with multi-modal agentic workflows, but for 80% of general use cases, no "secret sauce" needed, the open weight models are already there, and tooling is constantly getting better. The bottleneck is the cost of local hardware right now. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||