| ▲ | tavavex an hour ago |
| I don't understand. What is 'unlimited' PTO? And if it's so unlimited, why can't you use any of it? I've only had jobs with very specifically defined PTO that had no ambiguity in whether I could ever use it. |
|
| ▲ | compiler-guy an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| "Unlimited PTO" is a fiction created by accountants that sounds good on paper. When you need or want time off, you work it out with your manager. No debate about how many days you have left this year, or how many you have accumulated. It's undefined and technically you are supposed to work together and away you go. Accountants like it because guaranteed time-off is a liability that appears on the company's books as a debt, especially in California where the company is required to pay it out when you leave (whether fired or voluntary). But what happens in practice is no one feels like they are entitled to the time they should be entitled to, and negotiations from the employee side always come from a place of weakness. It's a terrible system. Undoubtedly someone will respond to this post with just how amazing their manager is and that they have never had a problem. But you know when I have never had a problem taking time off, even a long time off? When I could point to the corporate policy that says I have X days, and I was taking those days. And now I'm not playing manager roulette on whether or not I have the time, or how kind they are feeling. Or how buddy-buddy we are. It's one of those things that are great in theory, and terrible in real life. |
| |
| ▲ | jandrewrogers 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | You have to manage discretionary PTO. The problem has almost never been people taking too much but taking too little. At some companies, the directive from the top to management was to make sure people took at least 3-5 weeks of PTO every year. For legal reasons you can't keep official track of this (it will be imputed as accrual) but managers would actively nudge people to take more PTO. If you proactively manage it, it works pretty well. | |
| ▲ | superfrank 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > But what happens in practice is no one feels like they are entitled to the time they should be entitled to, and negotiations from the employee side always come from a place of weakness. It's a terrible system > Undoubtedly someone will respond to this post with just how amazing their manager is and that they have never had a problem. That me! Except I don't think it has anything to do with my manager or company. I've worked 5 different jobs over the last 12 years with 8 or 9 different managers and literally never had an issue with taking the time I want while taking 6-8 weeks of PTO a year. I've hit the point where when I'm looking for a new job unlimited PTO is kind of table stakes. I manage a few teams now with some people in the US where my company does unlimited PTO and others in Canada where our company cannot give unlimited PTO. Looking at my teams, the amount of PTO people take has almost no correlation to whether they have unlimited PTO or a set number of days. I have US employees who take a ton of PTO and Canadian employees who have burned through their entire balance and then some and I have employees in both places who take essentially none. I get that if you're in that second group it's preferable to be in a place where you'll get paid out for the days you didn't take, but I'm pretty convinced that unlimited vs set days has almost no bearing on how many PTO days someone will actually take. | |
| ▲ | georgeecollins an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Exactly- sounds great but in practice often not great. Depends on the culture. I once worked for a small but ultimately very successful start up, as a married guy with kids. Unlimited PTO sounded great. Until I planned my second week long vacation in a year and got a lot of side eyes. Two weeks per year of vacation was less then what I got when PTO was "limited". In practice under unlimited PTO you could take a week off but more than that resulted in a PIP for something else. | |
| ▲ | nly 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I worked at a small firm once where an 18 year old joined and took full advantage of the "unlimited PTO". He was taking roughly a third of his time off. Fired inside 6 months, and amazed it took this long. | | |
| ▲ | aksss a minute ago | parent [-] | | It reminds me of the Dilbert joke about asking to be put on 4-10’s and the boss replies why would I do that when I already have you for 7-12’s? With unlimited PTO, if you can only take it when there’s no work to do.. well in my business the work is never done. Demand outstrips supply so completely and consistently, it would be an impossible hurdle. I’ve worked in jobs where even limited PTO was near impossible to take beyond the occasional one or two days. Banked PTO was basically considered your severance package. Seems hard to set expectations correctly with unlimited PTO plans. |
| |
| ▲ | peab 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | we have "unlimited" time off, with the recommendation of taking off at least 1 week per quarter. This seems to work pretty well, and I'd rather have this than 20 days PTO. I usually try to take 1 week off, as well as 1 day here and there for an extra long weekend. | |
| ▲ | rectang an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | From the perspective that a company is an amoral profit-seeking automaton, it's not a "terrible system", it's a successful initiative to reduce compensation. | |
| ▲ | DanielHB 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Is it really a financial liability part really pushing companies for these policies? I never heard this argument before and compared to salaries PTO is minuscule liability... Seems much more likely companies just trying to squeeze employees into taking less PTO. | | |
| ▲ | compiler-guy 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Pretty much every article on a naive Google search lists "reduced financial liability" as one of the corporate benefits. Even the ones that talk about more complicated financial scenarios deal with "unexpectedly short-staffed" rather than, "We have a big financial liability on our books." A somewhat random example: https://www.higginbotham.com/blog/unlimited-pto-pros-cons/ "Cost efficiency. Traditional PTO policies can result in financial liabilities due to unused vacation payouts when employees leave the company. With unlimited PTO, these liabilities are eliminated. This can be particularly advantageous for companies looking to manage their finances more effectively." |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Aurornis an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Normal PTO is earned in increments of hours per pay period. Each person has an accrued PTO balance that they draw down from when they go on vacation. From the accounting perspective, the company is not paying them for work during this time, they are paying the employee out of their earned PTO balance. This creates some complications for the company where the accumulated PTO can be a liability on the books. It's a number that represents something they have to pay out with no labor in return. Depending on laws and circumstances they may also have to pay out the PTO balance when someone departs the company. Some companies skip all of this by switching to untracked PTO, which is often sold as unlimited PTO. Employees don't accumulate a PTO balance and when they go on vacation they get paid normally, not out of a separate bucket. No extra liabilities on the book. The trick is that PTO is now up to your manager's approval and judgment. At good companies you can actually take advantage of this for a more relaxed and flexible PTO schedule if you get your work done. I have done it and it's great when the company is good. At bad companies, it becomes a trick where your manager always says "I don't know, now isn't really a good time to take that much time off" and then everyone gets less vacation time than they had before. I have also experienced this and it's very depressing. |
|
| ▲ | AlexB138 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Most companies use the term "discretionary PTO". That means that there is no set limit on PTO. The positive take on it is that this means employees can take time off within reason so long as they're getting their work done. The negative take is that it means you have no guaranteed days you can take, and cultural or managerial pressure will prevent you from taking even a normal amount of vacation. It also means that employees don't accrue PTO days, and therefore don't have to be paid out for that time when they're fired. |
| |
| ▲ | tavavex an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Does this unlimited PTO still have to adhere to any legally required minimum PTO limits? If not, what prevents them from just not giving their employees any time off ever and bypassing the peer pressure part entirely? | | |
| ▲ | jandrewrogers 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | PTO regulations are created by the individual States. None require PTO to exist. They do regulate accrual of PTO if it exists, sometimes with unintended consequences for employees. The origin story is that "discretionary PTO" was created to enable people to take longer vacations than was feasible within the regulatory constraints of accrual-based PTO. It can be abused in other ways but the intent of the people that invented it were employee-friendly. | |
| ▲ | compiler-guy an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | It does not. Nothing. | | |
| ▲ | yladiz an hour ago | parent [-] | | Maybe in the US, but in countries with minimum holiday time you get the minimum in your contract (or a bit more) and the employee handbook says you have unlimited. Companies can’t shirk their responsibility here legally by saying they give unlimited vacation. | | |
| ▲ | compiler-guy 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | "Contracted minimum with more at manager's discretion" isn't what people usually mean when they talk about unlimited pto. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | compiler-guy an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | The shift from the tem "Unlimited PTO" to "Discretionary PTO" has happened because early proponents realized it wasn't really unlimited, and they didn't want workers to think that way. But the "unlimited" term is still used to sell it, and still often appears in informal recruiting conversations. It's just so slimy. | | |
| ▲ | ryandrake 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Reminds me of "Unlimited data" plans from ISPs, which are actually limited, but they just don't want to tell you about them. Anytime something is marketed as unlimited, it's not. | |
| ▲ | AlexB138 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, the current reality of it isn't great at a lot of companies. I've been places where it was done well though. For instance, having a mandatory minimum number of days of vacation helps combat pressure to not take time off, and leaders who openly encourage people to take their time helps combat a culture of not taking time. It started as a positive thing, intending to trust the employees and give flexibility. Unfortunately, like a lot of things, sleazy leaders turn flexibility into manipulation. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | pixl97 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Its a trick used to avoid financial liability. https://www.businessinsider.com/unlimited-pto-vacation-scam-... |
|
| ▲ | willis936 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's unlimited in that you can request time off at any time with no balance or speed limit. The first order justification is that it saves some money from having to pay out unused time off balances at the end of the year / tenure or have people burst time off at random synchronous periods. However the second order effect is that the "how much time off is too much time off" is never defined and is a moving target. "If I take four weeks this year and things get tight next year will I show up on a filtered list for layoffs?" It's uncomfortable for employees but employers tout how comfortable it is. |
| |
|
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | lbrito an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Its a way for US companies to avoid paying money. When employees get real PTO, companies have some legal and tax obligations. With fake "unlimited" PTO, they just pretend the person is working as usual. |
|
| ▲ | nsxwolf 42 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If you tell me I have "Unlimited" PTO, I'm taking 5 weeks, because that's what I've had at every regular PTO job in the last 20 years. |