| ▲ | jarrettcoggin an hour ago | |
I was thinking the exact same thing. There are multiple places to implement hooks (git hooks, Claude hooks, etc.). One thing I've been wondering about is how to reliably protect specific portions of the system from unexpected/unnecessary change (for example, a failing test that Claude decides to comment out or rewrite to get it to pass). My only thought for this was to automatically revert test changes during specific portions of the implementation, but that feels overly rigid and potentially prevents things like refactoring code. | ||