> Yeah, the entire suite of proposed "standards" catering to agents looks like a temporary measure to duct-tape over the limitations and token costs of today's agents.

That's fine. We need a fix for today's problems today.

▲

kijin 3 hours ago | parent [-]

True, that's fine. As long as people don't elevate these transient "standards" to the same level as something like basic security and accessibility.

	▲	locknitpicker 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> True, that's fine. As long as people don't elevate these transient "standards" to the same level as something like basic security and accessibility. I don't think that's it at all, and I'm baffled as the suggestion it is. These things are just formats for ad-hoc interfaces to help share context used by agents. It's in the same vein of designing cli apps with progressive disclosure in mind.