Why is this a paper? It's just using the n-cpu-moe option on llama.cpp? What am I missing here?

It's amazingly vacuous isn't it? I think the most interesting read was the fact that they were surprised llama.cpp crashed when they used a bad set of commandline arguments.

Although in the section immediately above the observation they claimed that they ran 10 whole completions with 100% success rate. So who knows.

I have to admit I slightly miss the flood of AI-psychosis research papers that seemed to be popping up a couple of months ago. Good to know there's still one or two new ones floating around.

Apparently the author has a patent about it, too.