| ▲ | colechristensen an hour ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huh? Plenty of places have geology where the rocks were formed under ancient oceans and are full of sea fossils. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | saaaaaam an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maybe. But I don’t see anything in this piece that says that it’s a fossil, rather than something that resembles this person’s idea of a fossil. It doesn’t look like a fossil to me. It looks like a piece of rock that’s been bashed about a bit. And given the whole premise of the piece is “this should not be here!” I don’t really understand the point you’re making. The author says it’s a strange find in that area - so either they have a valid point or they don’t. I don’t know if it’s a fossil. It doesn’t look like a fossil to me. I’m not a fossil expert. The only way to tell if it is a fossil is to do some analysis on the actual specimen before writing screeds about what it might or might not be based on visual similarity. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||