| ▲ | brookst 15 minutes ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is like saying you gave a Taylor Swift fan sheet music from 1984 and from Michael Jackson’s thriller and they couldn’t tell the difference. I have a strong affinity for Claude Code because of the interaction experience and overall tone / vibe / process. I am 100% willing to believe the code it produces is identical or possibly less good than Codex. I enjoy working with Claude in a way I just don’t get from OpenAI. YMMV, you may feel just the opposite. But it’s a mistake to look at the produced code as the only dimension of these products. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | amazingamazing 10 minutes ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is my point. The harness itself creates feelings that are positive, but the artifacts produced are similar. It is like the employee who is slightly worse but is a brownnoser getting promoted more often. And what do you know, that is what is happening. It is like the coke commercial with the nice music and beautiful person in the back. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||