| ▲ | dijit an hour ago | |||||||
we have about 30 years of catching up to do, better defense spending: 1) Saves our lives in Europe, by having access to better training and force multipliers. 2) Seeps into the economies of every country in the union through research spending. Defence is unambiguously a good thing, it becomes a problem if you put an expansionist cunthead at the helm of it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Gomotono 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | |||||||
We can discuss if a society should have a certain amount of GDP invested into defense and i'm not necessarily against it. I would think educating people properly is good, I also think the swizz model is good in sense of everyone learns to handle a gun and can have it at home (as long as high security standards are set and its taken very serious). It could be used as a tool to strengthen societies responsibility, communication and combined with what the THW is doing (technical help org). But my statment is still true: We do not have to catch up. We are absolutly capable of defending ourselfs against the current biggest threat which is Russia. | ||||||||
| ||||||||