akerl_ an hour ago | parent [-]

+1 to this. Other than people's reflexive anger or fear about AI coming for their code, I don't see anything to suggest that these are bugs that are due to the inclusion of AI vs bugs in a program with a bunch of complex interop with the filesystem and network.

triggis an hour ago | parent [-]

In any case, it's important to identify projects that are beginning to actively vibecode and clearly express position on this issue on various platforms so that authors and maintainers receive feedback. Even if this particular bug was not written by LLM in this particular case, it's not a fact that the release does not include other regressions and that subsequent vibecoded versions will not include them & new ones.

	▲	skeledrew 14 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> it's not a fact that the release does not include other regressions and [...] Are you listening to yourself? The same exact thing also has applied, applies and will continue to apply to manually written code, in perpetuity. There's nothing new under the sun here; regressions happen when there's change, and the only way to mitigate is to have healthy feedback loops.
	▲	akerl_ 27 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		No. It's not important. It's actually pretty shitty to go around looking for projects and then telling the maintainers you disagree with how they develop.
	▲	stsquad 29 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Do not going harassing developers because you think they are doing it wrong. If you can do better and don't want to actually contribute to the upstream you are always free to fork it.