| ▲ | archargelod an hour ago | |
That's actually a great argument for Nim[0]. Easy interop with C, native-speed performance, and a syntax very close to Python in both readability and how quickly you can get something working. Batteries included, automatic memory management without a conventional GC and metaprogramming - is a really cool combination. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/ | ||
| ▲ | tatjam an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Aggh if only its LSP was better! I have always run into issues when using Helix with it (it kept crashing), and I'm absolutely spoiled by good LSPs in other languages :( Wish I had the time and skill to actually contribute to the LSP, if you have ever used Nim it's a seriously underrated language. | ||
| ▲ | pmarreck 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
it is my second choice next to Zig and does have a lot of cool features, for sure. The nice thing is that all these languages feature easy C interop so you can use a C FFI as the interface between them if you want to experiment with, for example, writing a module in Nim | ||