| ▲ | cvince 5 hours ago | |
Whatever happened to all the pretext hype? I feel like that would be perfect for rendering huge diffs. | ||
| ▲ | amadeus 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Yes and no. It would help to improve things a bit when it comes the measure/reconciliation phase (unclear to say how much). However we've already done a pretty good job around batching writes vs reads. However passing a million lines of code through pretext is unlikely to be very efficient, so a lot of the work around estimation is still very important. That said, while I don't want to make pretext a direct dependency of the library, there's a good chance I'll explore the possibility of allowing devs to pass it in as an additional argument perhaps improve performance a bit. It should also be noted that we have a full API to support things like line annotations (comments, etc) that are entirely controlled by the user, so there's always a bit of a dynamic aspect there that would come into play | ||
| ▲ | taejavu 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Can you select and copy text with pretext? | ||